Future of Clinical Research


eConsent regulations: What changed under FDA, ICH E6(R3), Part 11 and global regulations
Electronic informed consent, or eConsent, is no longer a novel approach to clinical research. Regulators around the world increasingly recognize electronic, remote and technology-enabled approaches to informed consent as part of modern clinical trial conduct.
But the regulatory environment has changed significantly.
The most important development is not a single new eConsent regulation. Instead, updates to Good Clinical Practice, electronic systems guidance and national clinical trial frameworks are changing how sponsors can design, document and manage informed consent.
ICH E6(R3) is central to that change. FDA issued E6(R3) as final guidance in September 2025, describing the revision as a modernization of GCP that embraces innovation in trial design, conduct and technology while emphasizing quality by design, participant protection and risk-based approaches. FDA subsequently withdrew its E6(R2) guidance in April 2026.
At the same time, regulatory developments in the United States, European Union, United Kingdom and Canada are providing clearer frameworks for electronic records, remote interactions and alternative ways of documenting consent.
For sponsors, CROs and clinical trial sites, the question is therefore changing. It is no longer simply, "Can informed consent be electronic?"
Increasingly, the question is: How can electronic informed consent be implemented in a way that protects participants, supports understanding, verifies identity where required, preserves reliable records and meets the requirements of every jurisdiction involved in a trial?


What does the new European Medicine Regulatory Network recommendation paper on decentralized elements in clinical trials tell us?
Learn what impacts the new European Medicine Regulatory Network recommendations paper means to your clinical trial operations.


New EU Regulatory Recommendations for Decentralized Trials Keep Focus on Patients and Sites
As clinical trials rapidly modernize, government regulators work to evolve even as the same core principles apply. Still, decentralized clinical trials are – simply – clinical trials, as all research today is decentralized in some way, yet we lack global harmonization of regulations.


Back to basics: How digital and decentralized clinical trials enable trial diversity
The advancement of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) allows patients to participate without having to travel to a trial site, removing many barriers that may have hindered people of diverse backgrounds from participating.


Back to basics: How hybrid and decentralized technologies impact each phase of the clinical research journey
Clinical trials require volunteers to assess medical products like devices, vaccines, or medications for efficacy and safety. For health equity to be achieved, it’s imperative that clinical trials include people from diverse backgrounds so as to represent the global population of patients using the products.


2023: The year of the site. We are listening.
As 2022 rounds the bend, the life science industry is at a critical juncture in the adoption of the decentralized clinical trial (DCT) model.


Report: Medable named #1 Leader in DCT for second year by Everest Group
For the second consecutive year, Medable has been named Leader decentralized clinical trial products per the Everest Group’s PEAK Matrix® assessment, which evaluates DCT products from 24 companies based on vision, capability and market impact.


DCT takes center stage at DIA 2022 with new Tufts CSDD Study
DIA 2022 provided four days worth of content spanning over 13 talk tracks and hundreds of speakers with three major takeaways.


Improving diversity in clinical trials: An industry leader talks progress and surprises
We sat down with Rosamund Round, VP, Patient Innovation Center and Decentralized Trials at Parexel, about the challenge of improving diversity in clinical trials and what Parexel is doing to meet it.




