Blog posts
The biggest misconceptions about agentic AI readiness
To say there’s movement within the agentic life sciences market would be an understatement. According to seven different market research organizations, the “Agentic AI in clinical trials market” is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of anywhere between 12.5% and 43%.
While many sponsors and CROs surveyed want agentic AI operating at some level within their clinical trials, almost none of them think they're ready for it. "Our systems don't talk to each other." "Our data is a mess." "We need a two-year foundation project before we can even think about agents." These aren't fringe concerns, they're the default assumptions in nearly every boardroom conversation about AI adoption.
Here's the problem. Those assumptions are very wrong, and they're costing sponsors real time. While teams wait for the "right" conditions to start, the gap between early movers and everyone else keeps widening. The truth is, readiness isn't a prerequisite for agentic AI, it's a byproduct of starting.
Below, we take on the myths that keep organizations stuck in planning mode, and the facts that show why the window to start is now, not after your data is perfectly clean and your stack is fully unified.
Clinician Reported Outcomes (CROs): A universal approach
Get the basics on ClinROs, why they are important, the industry governance around them, and how their electronic versions can benefit clinical trials.
Podcast: How do you ensure clinical trial access for all?
Medable CEO Michelle Longmire joins Beyond the Molecule Podcast to discuss how the industry can expand clinical trial access to all populations.
Informed Consent Forms (ICFs) for Clinical Trials: Write with plain language please
Informed consent is a critical element of any clinical trial, as it starts the process that leads to a patient's participation in a trial. An informed consent form (ICF) is written by sponsors and delivered to patients to provide them with all the information they need about the study to make an informed decision around their participation. Traditionally done with paper-and-pen, an effective ICF is clear, concise, and straightforward, while covering all of the required elements defined by regulatory bodies, such as Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as defined in ICH E6(R2). Unfortunately, many ICFs are not well-written, use overly scientific language, and are overly complex, which can confuse and potentially alienate a potential participant. This blog examines ways to improve this important communication process using clear language and the latest technology.
Where does patient recruitment end and patient engagement begin?
It’s widely understood that patient recruitment is one of the most critical and yet most challenging aspects to a successful clinical trial. In fact, many trials fail to reach recruitment goals, with far-ranging implications for investigators, sponsors, study participants, and the population affected by the disease or condition under study.