Knowledge Center

“Big corporations can’t rely on their internal speed to match the transformation that is happening in the world. As soon as I know a competitor has decided to build something itself, I know it has lost.” 

These candid sentences from Sanofi CEO, showcase one of the most common questions that’s at the forefront of every pharmaceutical company’s mind; whether to build or buy your way into the agentic and generative AI revolutions. 

In life sciences, many teams start with the same instinct. They see a capable large language model, stand up a proof of concept, and feel close to a breakthrough. For most of us, AI prototypes can look magical. A chatbot summarizes visit reports, drafts emails, or answers protocol questions in minutes. The experience is so strong that teams assume production is a short step away.

Unfortunately, the gap is much bigger than it looks. 

According to a recent MIT study, 95% of AI pilots will fail, as they note that “Only 5% of custom GenAI tools survive the pilot-to-production cliff, while generic chatbots hit 83% adoption for trivial tasks but stall the moment workflows demand context and customization.”

Like MIT’s example shows, moving from prototype to production in clinical research means building something validated, compliant, scalable, and integrated into real workflows. That takes far more than clever prompts. It requires domain grounding, continuous monitoring, retraining loops, robust tool orchestration, and evidence that the system is safe and auditable under regulations like GxP, HIPAA, and 21 CFR Part 11.

Many organizations only discover the hidden costs after they have committed. Internal teams often invest for two years, spend millions in sunk cost, and still never reach a dependable clinical grade system. The illusion comes from how easy it is to get an early demo working, and how hard it is to make that demo survive contact with trial reality. 

‍

It’s been said that the only constant in the world is change. 

For decades, clinical trials have been a human only endeavor, with teams of clinicians, study teams, and patients working hand in hand to bring the latest molecules to market. Now, a new central actor has entered the clinical paradigm, agentic artificial intelligence. 

Only three years after OpenAI kicked off the artificial intelligence arms race, AI has gone from requiring users to prompt it, to pre-emptively identifying bottlenecks, safety risks, and more, thanks to agentic AI. 

Agentic AI is an autonomous, goal-oriented system that uses reasoning and external tools to independently plan, execute, and adapt multi-step actions with minimal human intervention to achieve complex objectives. 

Sponsors and CROs have begun using AI agents across their workforces to improve trials in ways that humans have traditionally struggled to accomplish. For instance, organizations have been creating AI agents to analyze prior trial protocols, benefiting from lessons learned across prior trials and real-world outcomes, enabling teams to anticipate risks and automating elements of submission drafting. Anomaly detection has helped teams better identify outliers in operational metrics or safety signals, prompting early interventions. Document intelligence accelerates medical writing by grounding generative outputs in verified data, which reduces cycle time without sacrificing accuracy. 

However, in each of these use cases, humans remain squarely “in the loop.” Or rather, the decision making isn’t left entirely to AI. Instead, the objective is to augment clinical, regulatory, and legal teams with tools that surface the right information at the right time.

This core concept, keeping a human in the loop, is essential to clinical decision making and operations as agentic AIs, while powerful, are not inherently suited to fully autonomous operation in all regulated contexts.

‍

The 2025 ESMO AI & Digital Oncology Congress, held in Berlin from November 12 to 14, highlighted the accelerating role of artificial intelligence across the oncology care continuum. Although imaging and pathology remain the most established fields for AI adoption, this year’s programming revealed a decisive shift toward workflow-integrated AI that enhances clinical operations, supports trial efficiency, and addresses the realities of patient monitoring. 

Across three days of sessions, side-room conversations, and industry demonstrations, one theme was clear. AI is evolving from experimental add-on technology into a practical clinical teammate, but scaling its impact will require robust validation, seamless integration, and a sustained focus on clinician trust.

‍

Discover how Medable’s AI-powered oncology platform simplifies complex cancer trials by integrating eCOA, ePRO, and eConsent solutions—reducing trial time, improving patient retention, and enhancing data quality for faster, more efficient research.

‍

Learn how Medable is powering a decade-long, global long-term follow-up (LTFU) obesity study, achieving an impressive 97% patient retention rate without using a traditional EDC system all while delivering a compliant, scalable, and cost-efficient solution.

‍

It has become clear that our industry has reachedthe limits of human-only clinical development. As clinical trials have become increasingly complex, the endeavors that people alone can perform are no longer sufficient to generate the momentum needed to address the growing burden of human disease. This has led to longer drug development timelines and significant delays for patients. One large are of lost time is “white space,” definied simply as unproductive time caused by manual, sequential processes and fragmented data systems. Thankfully, a solution lies in agentic AI and its abilities to perform series of tasks.

Deployment of remote and virtual clinical trial methods and technologies, referred to collectively as decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), represents a profound shift in clinical trial practice. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the financial net benefits of DCTs has not been conducted

Research looking at mobile apps and how they may provide a meaningful access point for all stakeholders for symptom management.

By now, most people are familiar with ChatGPT and other general-purpose AI tools such as Perplexity. These horizontal AI systems have become commonplace, assisting users with tasks like composing emails, summarizing information, or generating creative ideas. Their adaptability across a wide range of domains demonstrates the power of general intelligence and transfer learning. 

However, in the high-stakes and highly regulated context of life sciences, it is important to ask whether such tools are suitable for clinical use. In this setting, a vertical agentic AI approach—purpose-built for specific domains—provides the precision, reliability, and compliance necessary for success. While both horizontal and vertical agentic AI play essential roles in the broader evolution of intelligent systems, it is the vertical approach that ensures the rigor and accountability demanded by life sciences applications.

‍

Explore how artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally transforming every facet of clinical trials, from initial protocol design and patient recruitment to data management and regulatory approval. This comprehensive guide provides an authoritative, in-depth look at AI's role in accelerating drug development and improving patient outcomes, with special focus on emerging agentic AI technologies.

‍