Introduction: Understanding the AI revolution in clinical trials

The clinical trial landscape is undergoing a monumental shift, driven by the rapid integration of artificial intelligence. For decades, the process of bringing a new drug or therapy to market has been plagued by significant challenges: high costs, prolonged timelines, and enrollment issues. 

However, a transformative technology has emerged, one with the capabilities to bring clinical research into a new era. Next-generation "agentic AI" systems, characterized by advanced autonomy, adaptability, scalability, and probabilistic reasoning, address critical challenges in medical management. These systems enhance various aspects of healthcare, including diagnostics, clinical decision support, treatment planning, patient monitoring, administrative operations, drug discovery, and robotic-assisted surgery.

This comprehensive guide serves as a resource for navigating the AI revolution in clinical trials. We will explore how AI is impacting every stage of the trial lifecycle, from the earliest conceptual phases to post-market surveillance, with particular attention to the emerging field of agentic AI that represents the next frontier in clinical research automation.

Key AI technologies driving change in clinical research

Before diving into specific applications, it's crucial to understand the core AI technologies powering this transformation:

Machine learning (ML): Algorithms that learn from vast datasets to identify patterns and make predictions. ML is the engine behind many of the most impactful AI applications in clinical trials, from predictive analytics for patient recruitment to identifying adverse events and predictive outcomes (for instance the likelihood of a molecule to succeed)..

Natural language processing (NLP): Enables computers to understand, interpret, and generate human language. NLP is invaluable for analyzing unstructured data from sources like electronic health records (EHRs), patient notes, and scientific literature.

Computer vision: Allows AI systems to interpret and analyze visual data, such as medical images (MRIs, CT scans, etc.), to assist in diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Large language models (LLMs): Trained on vast amounts of text, LLMs can understand, summarize, and generate human language at scale. In clinical research, they are applied to tasks such as protocol review, patient-criterion matching, and document automation. For example, TrialGPT achieved 87.3% accuracy in patient-criterion matching, nearly matching expert levels (88.7%–90.0%).

Generative AI: Creates new data, text, images, or code. In clinical research, generative AI offers opportunities in automation of documentation, strengthening of participant and community engagement, and improvement of trial accuracy and efficiency.

Agentic AI: Agentic AI combines the raw power of large language models (LLMs) with the ability to plan, orchestrate, and complete tasks by interacting with other tools, data sources, and services. Unlike Generative AI, which responds to human prompting, agentic AI can break down complex tasks, reason through multiple steps, and independently execute actions to solve problems with minimal or no human oversight. Agents can also work together, very much like a team, to orchestrate complex tasks

Part 1: The agentic AI revolution in clinical trials

Gartner® predicts that by 2028, at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously through agentic AI, up from 0% in 2024. This represents the most significant advancement in clinical trial automation to date.

Understanding agentic AI: Beyond traditional automation

Rather than a single intelligent assistant, agentic AI can work as a single agent, or a coordinated team of agents, collaborating behind the scenes to complete high-value work.  While generative AI might produce a helpful checklist based on historical best practices, agentic AI takes action, like an autonomous research and lab assistant. 

The foundational components of agentic AI:

  • Instruction: The policies and guidelines the agent must follow
  • Model: The LLM that powers its reasoning capabilities
  • Tools: External APIs and functions it can use to take action
  • Model Context Protocols: MCPs are an emerging standard that define how AI agents communicate with external tools, data sources, and services in a structured and secure way. They act like a protocol layer between the AI model (the "agent") and the outside world, ensuring consistent interaction patterns.
    • Think of MCPs as the APIs for agentic AI, but instead of being designed only for developers, they’re structured so that AI models themselves can understand and use them.
    • They describe what tools exist, what actions are available, what data types they consume/produce, and the rules for using them.

Real-world agentic AI applications in life sciences

Transforming site activation processes

The application of agentic AI to site activation processes demonstrates the transformative potential of this technology in addressing one of the most persistent sources of whitespace in clinical development. Traditional site activation involves numerous sequential steps, including site identification and qualification, contract negotiation, regulatory submissions, training delivery, and technology deployment. Each of these steps typically requires coordination between multiple stakeholders, with handoffs between different functional groups creating opportunities for delays and communication breakdowns.

Agentic AI systems can coordinate these activities in parallel rather than sequentially, automatically preparing site packages while contract negotiations are proceeding, scheduling training sessions based on real-time availability data, and proactively identifying potential obstacles that might delay site activation.

Continuous learning and optimization capabilities

The abilities embedded in these systems enables them to learn from previous site activation experiences, identifying patterns that predict which sites are likely to experience delays and what interventions are most effective in addressing specific types of obstacles. Rather than treating each site activation as an independent project, agentic systems can leverage accumulated knowledge to optimize approaches for different types of sites, geographical regions, therapeutic areas, and protocol complexities.

This learning capability means that system performance improves continuously as more data becomes available, creating compound benefits that extend beyond individual trials to impact entire development portfolios.

Real-time data management and monitoring

The data management and clinical monitoring capabilities of agentic AI systems offer perhaps the most immediate opportunities to reduce whitespace in ongoing trials. Traditional data monitoring requires human reviewers to examine individual patient records, often requiring review of data across multiple systems, identify potential issues, and coordinate with sites to resolve queries or discrepancies. This process, while necessary for ensuring data quality, creates significant delays in database lock activities and can become a bottleneck in study completion timelines.

Continuous oversight capabilities

Agentic systems can perform continuous, real-time data monitoring across multiple data sources, automatically identifying patterns that suggest data quality issues, protocol deviations, or safety concerns. Over recent years CRAs have become bogged down with multiple eClinical systems collecting data from sites and patients, reducing their ability to provide guidance and support to the sites running the study and reducing them to chasing missing data and trying to provide oversight across multiple systems.

Rather than waiting for scheduled monitoring visits or periodic data reviews, AI agents can provide continuous oversight that enables proactive intervention before issues become significant problems. This allows CRAs to return to more strategic activities, adding value to sites and providing trusted support in solving problems.

Integration capabilities and enhanced decision making

Finally, the integration capabilities of agentic AI systems address one of the fundamental structural barriers to reducing whitespace: decision making. These systems can operate across traditional organizational boundaries, accessing data from multiple sources, coordinating activities between different functional groups, and providing comprehensive visibility into trial performance that enables more effective decision making.

Rather than requiring human intermediaries to translate information between different systems and stakeholders, agentic systems can serve as intelligent integrators that ensure information flows seamlessly throughout the trial ecosystem.

Accelerated protocol development

An agent created towards eliminating whitespace during study startup can quickly synthesize regulatory requirements, therapeutic area precedent, and sponsor objectives to draft protocol designs and trial documents in record time.

The ROI of agentic AI in clinical trials

Agentic AI isn't just supporting clinical trials – it's actively redefining them. The return on investment includes:

  • Protocol optimization: 15-20% time savings and faster trial start-up
  • Enrollment risk management: 10-30% faster enrollment by helping to avoid trial stalls
  • Site performance: 5-15% cost reduction through better targeting
  • Change request processing: 25-40% cycle time reduction, leading to faster amendments

Key applications of agentic AI across the trial lifecycle

Site and safety monitoring: Agentic AI can predict potential risks and adverse events before they happen, generating real-time alerts and recommending immediate "next-best actions".

Protocol setup: The often-cumbersome process of setting up trial protocols is being streamlined as agentic AI can autonomously digitize, validate, and update protocols based on dynamic requirements.

Data management: Agentic AI continuously monitors, standardizes, and validates trial data in real-time across multiple sources, ensuring impeccable data integrity and minimizing errors.

Regulatory submission preparation: Agentic AI simplifies regulatory submission by automating data collation and formatting, enhancing compliance and significantly reducing administrative burden.

Part 2: Revolutionizing trial design and feasibility

The success of a clinical trial is determined long before the first patient is ever enrolled. The initial phase of trial design, protocol development, and site selection is the foundation upon which everything else is built. AI is fundamentally changing this phase, making it efficient.

Optimizing trial protocols and reducing "white space"

A significant challenge in clinical development is the "white space" between trial phases, which often adds years to the total trial duration. The total duration for oncology trials, for example, is 11.9 years, with 2.1 years of that being white space. Similarly, rare oncology trials have a total duration of 12.5 years, with 1.9 years of white space.

Simulating trial scenarios: AI models can simulate various trial scenarios, predicting the potential outcomes of different designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens. This allows researchers to refine their protocols in a virtual environment, minimizing risks and increasing the likelihood of success before committing significant resources.

Predicting trial feasibility: By analyzing real-world data (RWD) from sources like electronic health records (EHRs) and patient registries, AI can predict the feasibility of a trial. It can assess the availability of a suitable patient population, the potential for recruitment challenges, and the likelihood of meeting enrollment goals.

Refining inclusion and exclusion criteria: AI's ability to analyze complex datasets helps in defining inclusion and exclusion criteria with unprecedented precision. By identifying subtle patterns and correlations that human analysts might miss, AI ensures that the patient population is as appropriate for the trial as possible.

Reducing bias: When an algorithm is trained using biased datasets, it risks excluding large segments of the population that have been underrepresented in the past. Advanced AI systems now incorporate bias detection and mitigation techniques.

Strategic site selection and activation

Identifying and activating the right clinical trial sites is a critical factor for success. AI is transforming this process from a manual, guesswork-based task into a data-driven science.

Data-driven site identification: AI algorithms can analyze a wide range of data points—from a site's historical recruitment performance and therapeutic expertise to its patient demographics and geographic location—to identify the best-performing and most suitable sites for a specific trial.

Forecasting enrollment: AI models help select the best sites for studies, predict patient dropouts, and identify participant populations more likely to respond to treatments.

Optimizing study budget and logistics: By providing a clear, data-backed view of a site's capabilities and patient pool, AI helps in optimizing the trial budget and logistics, ultimately reducing overall costs and accelerating the trial timeline.

Part 3: Enhancing patient recruitment, diversity, and engagement

Patient recruitment is often cited as the single biggest challenge in clinical trials, with a significant percentage of trials failing to meet their enrollment targets. AI provides a powerful suite of tools to overcome this hurdle, making recruitment faster, more inclusive, and more patient-centric.

Accelerating patient identification and matching

The traditional method of identifying eligible patients—manual chart review and physician referrals—is slow and inefficient. AI offers a more scalable and accurate approach.

Unlocking EHR data with NLP: Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a key technology for this task. It can sift through vast amounts of unstructured data within EHRs, such as physician notes, lab results, and patient histories, to automatically identify potential participants who meet a trial's specific criteria.

Predictive matching: AI models can create predictive scores that match patients to the most suitable trials based on their genetic profile, disease markers, and other relevant data points. This ensures a more precise and personalized approach to patient selection.

Leveraging real-world evidence (RWE): By analyzing RWE from a variety of sources, including patient registries, insurance claims, and genomic data, AI can create a more comprehensive picture of a potential participant pool.

Improving participant diversity and inclusivity

Women, people of colour, and patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds have long been underrepresented in clinical trials, posing methodological and ethical challenges. AI is a critical tool for addressing this systemic issue.

Identifying underrepresented populations: AI algorithms can analyze demographic data and disease prevalence to help researchers identify and engage with underrepresented populations.

Reducing bias: When an algorithm is trained using biased datasets, it risks excluding large segments of the population that have been underrepresented in the past. Advanced AI systems now incorporate bias detection and mitigation techniques.

Domain-forward approach: Some have proposed a 'domain-forward approach', in which domain experts (such as medical professionals) are brought into the algorithm development process to help fill in crucial context gaps.

Elevating patient engagement and retention

Recruiting a patient is only half the battle; keeping them engaged and adherent to the trial protocol is equally important. AI-powered tools are helping to improve the entire patient experience.

Personalized engagement platforms: AI can power patient engagement platforms that deliver personalized content, timely reminders, and support based on a patient's specific needs and preferences.

Predicting patient dropout: AI models help predict patient dropouts and identify participant populations more likely to respond to treatments.

Wearable technology and remote monitoring: AI can integrate with wearable devices and other remote monitoring tools to collect real-time data on a patient's physiological parameters and activity levels.

Part 4: Streamlining data management and ensuring patient safety

Once a trial is underway, the sheer volume of data generated can be overwhelming. One of the challenges of conducting decentralised clinical trials is managing the massive amounts of data that must be collected and analysed. AI is revolutionizing data management by automating manual tasks, providing real-time insights, and enhancing safety monitoring.

Automated data collection and analysis

Efficient data entry and cleaning: AI can automate time-consuming data management tasks, such as data entry and cleaning, reducing the likelihood of manual errors and ensuring data consistency across different sources.

Real-time data monitoring: Through automated processes, AI helps detect anomalies, fill in missing data, and maintain consistency across integrated data sources.

Holistic data integration: AI helps manage the exponential growth of data in clinical trials, ensuring efficient data processing, categorization, and quality checks.

Proactive safety monitoring and pharmacovigilance

Patient safety is paramount, and AI is playing an increasingly vital role in enhancing safety monitoring and pharmacovigilance.

Predicting adverse events: AI-enabled algorithms have the ability to detect clusters of signs and symptoms to identify potential safety signals, and that can be done in real time. AI can be used to predict also adverse events in clinical trial participants.

Automated adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting: NLP and ML tools can automate the highly manual and time-intensive process of adverse drug reaction reporting.

Improving signal detection: AI can identify subtle safety signals and trends that might be missed by human reviewers, enabling a more comprehensive and proactive approach to patient safety.

The power of AI-powered eCOA

Traditional eCOA solutions have been a source of frustration for study teams due to long build times, manual processes, and budget unpredictability. AI-powered eCOA platforms are designed to transform this process:

Instrument generator: The AI-driven instrument generator can create digital eCOA screens instantly from a prompt or uploaded file, reducing the average study build time from 1-2 weeks to just one day.

Translation and localization engine: AI provides clinical-grade localization in over 70 countries and 120+ locales, resulting in a 75% faster translation process.

Smart configuration validation: Intelligent test automation automates 70% of testing for faster go-live and automatically generates evidence packages to ensure protocol compliance.

Part 5: Accelerating regulatory submission and post-market surveillance

The final stages of a clinical trial involve preparing for regulatory submission and, if successful, monitoring the therapy in the real world. AI provides critical support in both areas, ensuring a faster path to market and a safer product life cycle.

Streamlining regulatory compliance and documentation

The process of regulatory submission is often a massive undertaking, requiring the creation of countless documents and reports. AI is streamlining this process and reducing the risk of error.

Automated document generation: AI can automate the creation and management of regulatory documents, ensuring that reports and submissions are accurate, consistent, and delivered on time.

Predictive compliance audits: AI can analyze regulatory guidelines and trial data in real-time to provide alerts for any potential non-compliance issues.

Ensuring data integrity: By automating data cleaning and ensuring data consistency, AI helps to build a more robust and trustworthy data package for regulatory submission.

Enhanced post-market surveillance with real-world data

After a drug or therapy is approved, it's crucial to monitor its safety and effectiveness in the broader patient population.

Real-world evidence (RWE) analysis: AI can continuously analyze RWE from a variety of sources to identify potential safety issues and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of a treatment.

Social media and patient feedback analysis: NLP can be used to analyze patient-reported experiences on social media, online forums, and other digital platforms.

Forecasting post-marketing requirements: AI can predict the need for post-marketing studies by analyzing real-world data and regulatory requirements.

Part 6: Challenges, limitations, and critical considerations

While AI offers tremendous potential for transforming clinical trials, challenges include technical hurdles, ethical dilemmas, and regulatory uncertainties. Understanding these limitations is crucial for successful implementation.

Technical and methodological challenges

AI's real-world effectiveness is frequently diminished when applied to diverse clinical settings, owing to methodological shortcomings, limited multicenter studies, and insufficient real-world validations.

Key technical challenges:

  • Data quality and standardization: It is challenging to properly apply AI to create new sets of data due to the variety of forms and quality levels of medical record data.
  • Model generalizability: Real-world healthcare is characterized by diverse patient populations, variable data quality, and complex clinical workflows, all of which pose significant challenges to AI deployment.
  • Infrastructure requirements: Implementing AI in clinical trials requires significant investment, training, and validation. Infrastructure modernization and data integration are essential to overcome barriers.

Ethical and bias considerations

The identified challenges are ethical in nature and relate to data availability, standards, and most importantly, lack of regulatory guidance hindering the acceptance of AI tools in drug development.

Critical ethical considerations:

  • Algorithmic bias: The inherent bias in research datasets is one of AI's biggest obstacles. Patients of European and Caucasian descent are overrepresented in medical studies and genetic databases.
  • Health equity: Companies will need to include health equity considerations in their AI and ML systems to prevent problems from being exacerbated.
  • Transparency and explainability: General LLMs can be prone to inaccuracies, potentially leading to unreliable assessments or overlooking ethical concerns.

Regulatory and implementation barriers

FDA has established a steering committee to provide advice on the general use or feasibility of digital health technologies and the implementation of decentralized clinical trials, but challenges remain.

Implementation challenges:

  • Trust and adoption: Trust in AI remains critical, especially with complex machine learning models.
  • Regulatory uncertainty: FDA recently published a discussion paper "Using artificial intelligence and machine learning and the development of drugs and biological products" aimed to spur discussion with the community.
  • Training and change management: Successful AI implementation requires significant change management and workforce training to equip teams with necessary skills.

Part 7: What to consider when implementing an AI solution

The implementation roadmap: A phased approach

Successful AI agent adoption begins with early stakeholder and executive buy-in. Involving executives, functional leaders, and end-users from the outset ensures alignment on vision, priorities, and success metrics. Early engagement helps secure support, amplifies sponsorship across the organization, and ensures that critical insights are heard. Once sponsorship is in place, organizations should define objectives and scope clearly. This includes differentiating between using AI agents as augmentors, assisting human roles, versus leveraging them for more substantial role automation or replacement. It is essential to articulate the scope of agent roles, boundaries, and interactions to all stakeholders, using intuitive workflows and transparent configuration settings to avoid confusion.

Equally important is ensuring regulatory and ethical alignment. By adopting a compliance-first approach, organizations can align with industry standards such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and 21 CFR Part 11. Human oversight must remain central, with clear accountability, well-defined permission settings, and reliable audit trails. With governance in place, the next step is to prepare a gradual implementation plan. Organizations can pilot with low-risk use cases to demonstrate value and refine processes. Flexible deployment tools and Human-in-the-Loop features make incremental adoption easier. By taking an iterative approach, teams can progressively expand agent capabilities based on performance insights and feedback, steadily increasing autonomy at a pace that matches organizational readiness.

Adoption also requires champions who can lead the way. Identifying and empowering internal advocates early in the process helps drive adoption, address concerns, and build confidence across teams. At the same time, organizations must proactively address resistance by openly discussing the role of agents, showcasing positive real-world use cases, and setting realistic expectations. A user-centric design and transparent communication of both opportunities and limitations help establish trust and demonstrate immediate value, making adoption feel natural and beneficial from the start.

Educating stakeholders on human-agent collaboration ensures that AI adoption is framed as augmentation rather than mere automation. By positioning agents as collaborative tools that enhance, not replace, human decision-making, organizations foster trust and engagement. Transparent reasoning capabilities, such as explainability features and clear chains of thought, help ensure dependable collaboration and accountability. Alongside education, training and communication are vital. Comprehensive training programs, supported by user-friendly interfaces and extensive documentation, simplify onboarding and ensure that teams understand agent capabilities, limitations, and operational boundaries.

The world of AI development is vast, but it's crucial to draw a distinction between AI for other industries and AI for specific, hard-to-get-into verticals. Avoid choosing a broad company that does not have the grounding within your specific vertical. A partner with deep expertise in clinical trials, and ideally your specific TA and trial type, is necessary in order to understand the unique challenges you will face. 

For example, consider the writings of York.IE, an advisory and investment firm that helps technology companies grow. York.IE states that “one of the biggest limitations of horizontal AI is its lack of domain-specific expertise. A generic model like ChatGPT can generate a broad range of responses, but without access to proprietary industry data, it often fails in specialized use cases.” 

This expertise is vital for navigating complex issues like AI council approvals or industry-specific compliance requirements. A generic AI company may offer a platform, but a specialized partner offers a proven framework that is pre-validated for the nuances of your industry, ensuring long-term success and a more robust solution.

Finally, ongoing monitoring, measurement, and optimization help sustain long-term success. Continuous feedback loops enabled by real-time monitoring and performance analytics allow organizations to refine and improve their approach. Careful tracking of performance metrics and benchmarks provides accurate insights into agent performance and impact over time. Together, these steps create a structured, ethical, and effective pathway for AI agent adoption within organizations.

Part 8: Maintaining regulatory compliance with FDA and EMA AI standards

The use of AI in clinical trials is subject to evolving regulatory standards from agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

FDA's approach: A risk-based, flexible framework

The FDA has adopted a risk-based, flexible approach to regulating AI and machine learning (ML), particularly for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD):

Focus on safety and effectiveness: The FDA's primary concern is ensuring that AI systems are safe, effective, and reliable.

Predetermined change control plans: The FDA allows for modifications to AI algorithms post-approval without requiring new submissions, as long as changes fall within pre-agreed-upon plans.

Good machine learning practice (GMLP): The FDA has issued guiding principles emphasizing best practices for data quality, model development, validation, and transparency.

Total product lifecycle approach: The framework oversees AI throughout its entire lifecycle, from development to post-market monitoring.

EMA's approach: A structured, risk-proportional framework

The EMA is developing its regulatory framework for AI, aligning with broader European regulations like the EU AI Act:

Risk-proportionality: The EU AI Act classifies AI systems into different risk levels, with medical devices typically falling into the "high-risk" category.

Transparency and explainability: The EU AI Act requires transparency in training data, explicit documentation of validation methods, and continuous monitoring for high-risk medical applications.

Data integrity and governance: The EMA places significance on ensuring training data is high-quality, representative, and free from bias.

Regulatory interaction: The EMA encourages proactive engagement, recommending scientific advice or qualification opinions for novel AI methodologies.

Part 9: Future horizons and emerging trends

As we look toward the future of AI in clinical trials, several emerging trends and technologies promise to further revolutionize the field.

The evolution of application-specific language models (ASLMs)

Can artificial intelligence improve clinical trial design? Despite their importance in medicine, over 40% of trials involve flawed protocols. Application-specific language models (ASLMs) for clinical trial design could enhance trial efficiency, inclusivity, and safety, leading to more representative, cost-effective clinical trials.

The development strategy for ASLMs includes three phases:

  • ASLM development by regulatory agencies
  • Customization by health technology assessment bodies
  • Deployment to stakeholders

Advanced real-world data integration

The architecture of RWD platforms is shifting from monolithic stacks to composable ecosystems. CTOs are embracing microservices, containerization, and serverless computing to build resilient, adaptable systems.

Key developments include:

  • Composable data products: The most advanced R&D environments treat data products like APIs — tailored, discoverable, and built for reuse
  • User-friendly authoring studios: User-friendly authoring studios for creating and testing agents, models, and workflows are now essential to biopharma research technology

The end of mandatory animal testing

In 2025, the FDA began phasing out mandatory animal testing, promoting AI-based models and new approach methodologies (NAMs) to streamline and modernize drug development. This represents a major shift toward more humane and efficient preclinical testing methods.

Integration with advanced technologies

Future clinical trials will increasingly integrate AI with other cutting-edge technologies:

Predictive trial outcomes

Advanced AI systems can integrate preclinical knowledge with historical clinical data, facilitating end-to-end reasoning across the drug discovery and development continuum. By predicting success probabilities at various trial stages, identifying optimal biomarkers, and suggesting combination therapies, AI can enhance decision making and efficiency in clinical development.

Conclusion: Designing the future of clinical research

The integration of AI into clinical trials represents a fundamental transformation of medical research. Agentic AI has the potential to redefine healthcare, driving personalized, efficient, and scalable services while extending its impact beyond clinical settings to global public health initiatives.

The benefits are increasingly clear:

  • Reduced costs: Automation and optimization reduce operational expenses
  • Accelerated timelines: Streamlined processes compress development cycles
  • Improved patient outcomes: Better matching, monitoring, and safety protocols
  • Enhanced diversity: AI-driven recruitment reaches underrepresented populations
  • Superior data quality: Automated collection and validation ensure integrity

However, realizing the full potential of agentic AI will require sustained research, innovation, and cross-disciplinary partnerships to ensure its responsible and transformative integration into healthcare systems worldwide.