Knowledge Center

Clinical data speaks dozens of languages. Ontologies are the translator. Discover how life sciences teams are using semantic layers, AI agents, and MCP connectors to cut months of data harmonization down to days.

"The scarcest resource in clinical trials is the time of the highly qualified people running the clinical trials. We need to free up their time to bring more meaningful innovation to patients."

- David Hyman, Chief Medical Officer, Eli Lilly

Since the year 2000, the pace of drug approvals has remained stubbornly slow, with the FDA approving roughly 50 new treatments per year. This pace is in spite of massive increases in R&D investment. It’s well known that clinical trials take 10-12 years on average to complete all four phases. But what if clinical trials didn’t take weeks to start, months to enroll, and years to complete?

‍

Medable’s clinical trial platform leverages a robust network of connectors to integrate seamlessly with the systems that power study execution, from EDC and CTMS to collaboration and data platforms. These connectors enable AI to operate across workflows in real time, unifying data, automating processes, and improving coordination across team

‍

‍

Discover how AI-enabled eCOA and agentic workflows reduce clinical trial startup time, translation cycles, and meeting overhead—cutting eCOA build timelines from 16–20 weeks to under 8 weeks.

Learn how Medable enabled a top-5 pharma to scale vaccine mega-trials with near-100% enrollment, real-time safety data, and >90% diary compliance.

‍

How do you drive adoption in a complex women’s health study? See how ICON and Medable reached 85% eConsent uptake across 1,200+ participants with a smarter, site-first approach.

Deployment of remote and virtual clinical trial methods and technologies, referred to collectively as decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), represents a profound shift in clinical trial practice. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the financial net benefits of DCTs has not been conducted

Research looking at mobile apps and how they may provide a meaningful access point for all stakeholders for symptom management.

AI-powered remote patient monitoring (RPM) is transforming clinical trials by enabling continuous data collection, real-time insights, and decentralized participation. This ecosystem spans wearables, AI analytics, data platforms, and decentralized clinical trial (DCT) infrastructure.

Additionally, agentic AI is fundamentally reshaping remote patient monitoring (RPM) in clinical trials by shifting it from passive data collection to proactive, autonomous decision support. Instead of simply aggregating data from wearables and patient-reported outcomes, agentic systems can continuously analyze multi-source trial data, identify emerging risks, and take action, such as prioritizing at-risk patients or sites, triggering alerts, or recommending interventions, without waiting for human input. This significantly reduces delays in detecting safety signals or protocol deviations. Just as importantly, agentic AI introduces workflow automation at scale by handling routine monitoring tasks, coordinating communications, and maintaining audit-ready reasoning trails. The result is a more adaptive and responsive RPM model where clinical teams move from manual oversight to strategic supervision, enabling faster, safer, and more efficient trials.

Below is a structured overview of the leading vendors, tools, and providers enabling AI-driven RPM in clinical research.

‍

Combining artificial intelligence (AI) and agentic AI with electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) systems fundamentally enhances how clinical trial data is collected, interpreted, and acted upon. At its core, eCOA captures structured data directly from patients, clinicians, or observers, such as symptom severity, quality of life, or functional outcomes. Modern platforms expand this further by supporting a full range of assessment types, including electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO), clinician-reported outcomes (eClinRO), observer-reported outcomes (eObsRO), and performance outcomes (ePerfO).

‍

Digital data capture has become essential to modern clinical research. Sponsors and research organizations increasingly rely on electronic outcome assessment tools to collect high quality patient data, reduce manual errors, and improve regulatory compliance.

Two terms appear frequently in this space: eCOA (electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment) and ePRO (electronic Patient Reported Outcome).

These terms are closely related. However, they are not interchangeable.

‍