Blog posts
The Top 5 myths about eCOA in 2025
With MarketsandMarkets projecting the global electronic Clinical Outcome Assessments (eCOA) solutions market to grow at compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.1% each year until 2030, it’s clear the eCOA has made its impact within the clinical research landscape.
Yet despite growing adoption, electronic Clinical Outcome Assessments (eCOA) are still surrounded by misconceptions that hinder their full potential. From concerns about patient usability to assumptions about cost and implementation timelines, these myths can create hesitation among sponsors and research teams alike.
Thus, we’re here to cut through the noise and set the record straight with a summary of a recent webinar featuring speakers from Transcelerate and Medable.
Improving diversity in clinical trials: An industry leader talks progress and surprises
We sat down with Rosamund Round, VP, Patient Innovation Center and Decentralized Trials at Parexel, about the challenge of improving diversity in clinical trials and what Parexel is doing to meet it.
Designing patient-friendly ePRO instruments
This blog explores why patient-centric ePRO instrument design is critical to driving study success, provides tips on how to make instruments more patient-centric, and offers resources for additional ePRO design guidance.
Clinician Reported Outcomes (CROs): A universal approach
Get the basics on ClinROs, why they are important, the industry governance around them, and how their electronic versions can benefit clinical trials.
Podcast: How do you ensure clinical trial access for all?
Medable CEO Michelle Longmire joins Beyond the Molecule Podcast to discuss how the industry can expand clinical trial access to all populations.
Informed Consent Forms (ICFs) for Clinical Trials: Write with plain language please
Informed consent is a critical element of any clinical trial, as it starts the process that leads to a patient's participation in a trial. An informed consent form (ICF) is written by sponsors and delivered to patients to provide them with all the information they need about the study to make an informed decision around their participation. Traditionally done with paper-and-pen, an effective ICF is clear, concise, and straightforward, while covering all of the required elements defined by regulatory bodies, such as Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as defined in ICH E6(R2). Unfortunately, many ICFs are not well-written, use overly scientific language, and are overly complex, which can confuse and potentially alienate a potential participant. This blog examines ways to improve this important communication process using clear language and the latest technology.
Where does patient recruitment end and patient engagement begin?
It’s widely understood that patient recruitment is one of the most critical and yet most challenging aspects to a successful clinical trial. In fact, many trials fail to reach recruitment goals, with far-ranging implications for investigators, sponsors, study participants, and the population affected by the disease or condition under study.