
Related articles


ICON and Medable drive 85% eConsent adoption in U.S. menopause study
How do you drive adoption in a complex women’s health study? See how ICON and Medable reached 85% eConsent uptake across 1,200+ participants with a smarter, site-first approach.


eCOA vs ePRO: Understanding the differences in clinical trials
Digital data capture has become essential to modern clinical research. Sponsors and research organizations increasingly rely on electronic outcome assessment tools to collect high quality patient data, reduce manual errors, and improve regulatory compliance.
Two terms appear frequently in this space: eCOA (electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment) and ePRO (electronic Patient Reported Outcome).
These terms are closely related. However, they are not interchangeable.


Everest analysis: How Medable eCOA solves speed, patient experience, and customer needs
eCOA has moved from a supporting tool to a foundational pillar of modern clinical trials, and Everest Group agrees. In its inaugural eCOA Products PEAK Matrix Assessment, Everest named Medable a Leader, citing strong market impact, accelerated timelines, and a platform built for real-world trial complexity. As the eCOA market surges toward nearly $1B in value, this recognition underscores how speed, patient experience, and AI-driven innovation are reshaping how trials are designed, launched, and scaled globally.



