
Related articles


Key criteria for evaluating AI and agentic AI clinical trial vendors
Artificial Intelligence is rapidly transforming clinical research. From patient recruitment and protocol design to medical writing and data review, AI-powered solutions are becoming embedded across the clinical development lifecycle. More recently, the emergence of Agentic AI (systems capable of planning, reasoning, and executing multi-step workflows with varying degrees of autonomy) has generated significant excitement throughout the industry.
However, not all AI solutions are created equal. While many vendors promise dramatic improvements in efficiency and productivity, clinical trial organizations operate in one of the most highly regulated environments in the world. Success depends not only on technical performance but also on compliance, validation, governance, security, and trust.
As sponsors, CROs, and technology teams evaluate potential AI partners, they need a framework that extends beyond traditional software procurement criteria. The following considerations can help organizations assess both AI and Agentic AI vendors and identify solutions that are truly ready for clinical research.


Ontology 101: The semantic layer behind modern life sciences data
Clinical data speaks dozens of languages. Ontologies are the translator. Discover how life sciences teams are using semantic layers, AI agents, and MCP connectors to cut months of data harmonization down to days.


The AI Pilot Trap and How Clinical Trial Leaders Can Escape It
Most AI pilots in clinical trials fail to scale beyond proof of concept. Learn practical strategies for moving from isolated experiments to enterprise adoption.


